15 January 2013

International Media Mission Addresses Open Letter to Nepal Prime Minister

 

Media Release: Nepal

January 14, 2013

  

The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and partner organisations in the International Media Mission to Nepal, have addressed an open letter to the Prime Minister of Nepal, Dr Baburam Bhattarai, urging that the law be allowed to take its course, unimpeded by politics, in the case of the alleged murderers of journalist Dekendra Thapa.

 

Five political activists, associated with Nepal’s Maoist party and a breakaway group, were arrested between January 3 and 5 on charges of murdering Thapa, who was abducted from his home in June 2004 and murdered on August 11, 2004.

 

The investigation was however, ordered stopped by Nepal’s Prime Minister, on the grounds that a crime commited during the war years should be dealt with through a Truth Commission, rather than under ordinary criminal law.

 

The International Media Mission to Nepal, in which the IFJ has been associated from the very beginning, has been engaged with journalists and civil society groups in the country since 2006, seeking to strengthen the advocacy work for media freedom and the right to free speech.

 

The full text of the letter follows:

Dear Mr Prime Minister,

We are writing to you as members of the International Media Mission which has been engaged with journalists and civil society groups in Nepal over the last six years, to express our concern over your recent intervention in the case against the alleged murderers of journalist Dekendra Thapa.

At our meeting with you in February 2012, we discussed certain very serious challenges journalists face, identified in consultation with our local partners in the country. Among the urgent priorities mentioned was the need to address the prevailing climate of impunity for attacks against journalists and others exercising their right to freedom of expression.

At that time, we focused on a number of cases of journalists who had been killed after the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) of 2006 and identified specific areas where we had reason to believe that investigation and prosecution had been inadequate. At the same time, the problem of impunity has roots in a time from before the CPA and includes journalists who were killed during the decade-long conflict which ended with the informal ceasefire that followed the Jana Andolan of 2005.

As a result, we were greatly encouraged to hear that police in Dailekh district in the far-western region of Nepal had arrested five suspects between 3 and 5 January 2013 in connection with the August 2004 murder of Dekendra Thapa. Unfortunately, this was short-lived since we learnt soon afterwards of your personal instruction to the police to halt the investigation, on the grounds that a murder which occurred during the conflict should not be subject to ordinary criminal jurisdiction.

We recognise that there is a political consensus in Nepal on the need for a Truth Commission to deal with abuses which occurred during the conflict period. However, we note that there is still no agreement, after all these years, on the constitution of such a body, or on its mandate or the modalities it would follow.

According to the confessions made by the men arrested in Dailekh, Thapa was abducted in June 2004 and tortured for over a month before being killed. The outrage that followed his murder led a senior Maoist functionary to issue a public apology and to disclaim any link between the murder and party policy.

In this context, halting a process initiated under prevailing criminal law would send all the wrong signals and deeply erode the confidence of Nepal’s journalistic community. As our partner, the Federation of Nepali Journalists (FNJ), has repeatedly emphasised, the media community is in need of positive assurances that their safety will not be jeopardised. This is one among many steps needed to advance the transition to a political order in which freedom of expression and a free press are basic democratic entitlements. Nothing could be more calculated to undermine the confidence of the media community in this regard than halting legal proceedings against the alleged murderers of a journalist.

We are therefore of the view that a valuable public purpose would be served by allowing the criminal prosecution in Thapa’s murder to proceed and ask that you withdraw your instruction to halt the case. We also ask that you give your personal attention to other cases of journalists who have been killed, in particular those that our partner, the FNJ, has been tracking actively.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Jacqueline Park

Asia-Pacific Director

International Federation of Journalists

 

Toby Mendel

Executive Director

Centre for Law and Democracy

 

Barbara Trionfi

Press Freedom Manager

International Press Institute (IPI)

 

Oliver Spencer

Senior Communications and Advocacy Officer

Article 19

 

Elisabeth Witchel

Committee to Protect Journalists

 

Damian Loreti

AMARC

 

Ashish Sen

President

AMARC Asia-Pacific

 

Jesper Hojberg

International Media Support

 

For further information contact IFJ Asia-Pacific on +612 9333 0950

 

The IFJ represents more than 600,000 journalists in 131 countries

 

Find the IFJ on Twitter: @ifjasiapacific

 

Find the IFJ on Facebook: www.facebook.com/IFJAsiaPacific 

 

 

Nepal; Asia and Pacific; Press Releases

If you don't see one of your comments, that means that it is not moderated yet or it has been rejected.

Add a comment :

On {SITE_NAME}, you can share your opinion on all of our news.

This section is moderated. The texts will be published after editor approval. {SITE_NAME} reserves the right to reject any comment at any time.